It’s certainly been awhile since I last updated. Perhaps it was procrastination that held me within its clutches?
Just a heads up... this post does have a "moral to the story" but you'll want to read it all the way through to fully comprehend what it is.
Anyhow… my family and I traveled to Cincinnati this summer to see the home town reds take on my beloved Chicago Cubs. Anyone who knows much about baseball knows that the cubs have not won a world series since 1908. It’s simply a well known fact amongst most baseball enthusiasts. Now, I’m no math major, but if my calculations are correct, that means that the cubs have not gone all the way in a “gazillionyears.” “Gazillionyears” being a new statistic thought up by baseball statisticians to help describe just how long it’s been since the cubs won a World Series title. On the way home I began thinking about the game. It may sound strange but the highlight of the game for me was when the cub’s best middle infielder, #2 shortstop Ryan Theriot, was put in the game in the top of the 9th inning to pinch hit. Lou Pinnela, the cubs manager, planned to give Theriot the day off because Theriot had played many games consecutively, but in the ninth inning with the cubs trailing 4 runs to 0, and Theriots replacement coming to the plate to lead off the inning, Pinnela saw fit to insert Theriot into the lineup in hopes that he would provide some spark. Theriot quickly fell behind in the count and was forced to protect the plate with 2 strikes against him. As it often occurs during a two strike count in major league baseball, Theriot used his tremendous bat speed, while exemplifying stellar plate discipline in order to foul off several pitches. He even let a pair of off speed pitches go by the plate for balls. (*For those of you who are not familiar with baseball, a “ball” is called by the umpire when a pitcher throws a pitch that does not pass through the “strike zone” of the batter; after four balls are called a “base on balls” occurs. This allows the batter to go to first base.) He had battled back from a 0-2 count in a critical at-bat by successfully fouling pitches off and into the stands, as only the best contact hitters in the game of baseball could have done, and now the count was even at 2-2. One may wonder, “what makes Theriots ability to merely hit foul balls so great”? Well, when a batsmen falls behind no balls to two strikes in an at-bat they are saddled with the responsibility of “protecting the plate” to prevent themselves from striking out, (striking out, has not once in the history of baseball helped a team achieve victory.) Due to Theriots persistence in the batter’s box he was likely to get a much more hittable pitch now with the count even at 2-2 rather than 0-2. ScottbEyre (the Reds pitcher) delivered, the ball sailed smoothly but quickly towards the plate, a fastball, around 89 mph, the pitch was elevated too high for any pitching coaches liking and was left over the inner half of the plate. Theriot swung on, the pitch hit well, very well, a deep fly ball. The pitch sailed and sailed towards the left center field fence, forcing Reds centerfielder and speed-demon Willy Tavares into an earnest sprint. Finally he began to gather his lower body as he slowed his pace, which in turn signaled to the fans that rather than a homerun, Theriot had merely slammed a deep fly ball to left center. Tavares secured the fly ball in his glove as Theriot’s at bat proved to be nothing more than a very loud out number one. The next two batters were retired easily and the cubs began their journey on to another city to battle a different team. On the way home, I couldn’t help but think about what it was that made Ryan Theriot so much different than many other baseball players, who seemed to be much more interested in taking huge swings, hitting the long ball, daydreaming while playing defense, and just plain showing off, rather than doing every single thing possible to help their team win, regardless of whether or not they had to lay out in order to catch a tailing line drive, lay down a sacrifice bunt to help advance a teammate to the next base, or lean into a inside fastball to draw a walk. While I was thinking these things I thought about the cubs left fielder. In his earliest years in the Majors he was heralded as a “five tool player” (a truly great “all around player”) but after receiving recognitions as one of the games top players, Soriano began playing careless defense and began to lengthen his swing sacrificing his ability to hit the ball consistently in hopes of hitting more homeruns. After Soriano’s inadvisable ego boost came a team change; a trade to the Chicago Cubs. Long Story short, as crazy as it may sound, I decided to pray for Cubs left fielder Alfonso Soriano. No can truly be content with that much apathy, and pride in their life. After I prayed I really felt God beginning to speak to me. As silly as it sounds I felt that God was pointing out the differences between players (and people) like Soriano and people like Ryan Theriot. I believe He was telling me that Soriano didn’t understand that it wasn’t all about him, that he didn’t understand that he was in position to be apart of something so much bigger than just a quest for personal glory; a pennant race. I thought about how Theriot had played, and I believe God began to speak to me again. I believe God was provoking me to think about how Theriot understood his small role in something that was so much larger than just himself. I thought about how hard he always battled in the batters box, if only to just foul off as many pitches as he could to wear down the opposing pitcher. I thought about how Ryan Theriot never took a play off, while players like Soriano stood with their hands on their hips, daydreaming about their next plate appearance. I pray that God helps me to never take a play off in life, to never stop battling. Ryan Theriot swung his heart out in the at-bat I mentioned previously, and ultimately he failed; but life is full of failure (thank God). Because life is full of failure should we just pretty much give up, or merely attempt to squeeze as much personal glory out of it as possible? I don’t think so, I think God wants us to keep fighting, even whilst we fail, because you never know when your efforts, although they may seemingly fall short, will ultimately wear down evil. If you’re reading this I challenge you to live life fervently, to speak and ACT OUT the love of Christ fervently, EVERY TIME you get the chance. Surely you’re aware that you are apart of something bigger than yourself, but are you aware of the power Christ has given you to wear down on all types of deception, all types of discouragement, and all types of hatred? We all are going to hit some deep fly balls that don’t clear the fence, but it’s the understanding that we are apart of something bigger, something eternal, that will keep us going. We all are going to take stands for Christ (I hope!) that don’t resonate with everyone who witnesses it, but sometimes, it’s the willingness to take the time to wear down evil that God will honor in the end.
Friday, August 21, 2009
Saturday, July 18, 2009
liar... lunatic... no... LORD!
Before you read this... honestly think to yourself for 15 seconds about what it would be like if what you were supposed to devote yourself to was actually quite simple.
This summer I've realized how many friends I have who are searching, searching for truth. This summer I've realized how many of my friends are uncertain, uncertain about almost everything. Because of this I have been thinking alot about what it would be like to be in this situation myself. I've always had a Christian worldview, a scriptural perspective. If I were one these friends that I mentioned; would I desire set in stone proof that Christ is Lord? Would I at least require evidence that it is extremely likely? What would I believe in if I didn't confess Christ as Lord? I already live a life chock-full of sin, I'm already a huge hypocrit... how much more sin would there be in my life without Him? Would I live a life filled with peace, or a life filled with anguish and confusion?
C.S. Lewis, a phenomenal Christian author said it best, yet "He said it" without true precision. He said that if we don't make Christ Lord we make him a liar or a lunatic. I would contend that nearly all evolutionary scientists, atheists, muslims, and people of other faiths would confess that they believe a "man" named Jesus Christ once existed, and that he was a great moral teacher. There's just to much evidence (evidence accrued from secular work even) to deny it. But the theory that Christ was merely a great moral teacher that lied about being God doesn't pan out at all. Christ was not a great moral teacher if He Himself lied. His instruction to love your neighbor as yourself then meant nothing, His instruction to turn the other cheek, and to treat your neighbor as thyself then meant nothing. Besides, any man who knew full well that He would die an early, and agonizing death for the claim of His own deity should be considered a lunatic by default. In conclusion it is only reasonable to make Christ Lord, or lunatic. Not only am I unable to condemn a man who taught love, selflessness, and humility, to a status of lunacy but I am also unable to forget the blatent revelations of His own majesty that God has yielded unto me during my brief 19 year stint of life.
I pray that the blood of my friends (I consider literally anyone I know a friend in this regard) will not stain my hands now or ever.
I won't garner all of the peace, certainty, inexplicable guidance, and unabashed purpose that overflows in my life to myself.
Wisdom calls out in the streets, how much longer will you choose to evade it, and for how much longer will you choose to nurture new reasonings in order to justify this type of evasion? It doesn't matter what you have done, Christ still wants you. What if the "leap of faith," the leap from living a life filled with aimlesness, and uncertainty, to a life of purpose, isn't actually that scary but is rather a simple surrender?
I make each of the previous contentions as a sinner and hypocrit in need of Christ's unfailing love and mercy just as much as the next.
This summer I've realized how many friends I have who are searching, searching for truth. This summer I've realized how many of my friends are uncertain, uncertain about almost everything. Because of this I have been thinking alot about what it would be like to be in this situation myself. I've always had a Christian worldview, a scriptural perspective. If I were one these friends that I mentioned; would I desire set in stone proof that Christ is Lord? Would I at least require evidence that it is extremely likely? What would I believe in if I didn't confess Christ as Lord? I already live a life chock-full of sin, I'm already a huge hypocrit... how much more sin would there be in my life without Him? Would I live a life filled with peace, or a life filled with anguish and confusion?
C.S. Lewis, a phenomenal Christian author said it best, yet "He said it" without true precision. He said that if we don't make Christ Lord we make him a liar or a lunatic. I would contend that nearly all evolutionary scientists, atheists, muslims, and people of other faiths would confess that they believe a "man" named Jesus Christ once existed, and that he was a great moral teacher. There's just to much evidence (evidence accrued from secular work even) to deny it. But the theory that Christ was merely a great moral teacher that lied about being God doesn't pan out at all. Christ was not a great moral teacher if He Himself lied. His instruction to love your neighbor as yourself then meant nothing, His instruction to turn the other cheek, and to treat your neighbor as thyself then meant nothing. Besides, any man who knew full well that He would die an early, and agonizing death for the claim of His own deity should be considered a lunatic by default. In conclusion it is only reasonable to make Christ Lord, or lunatic. Not only am I unable to condemn a man who taught love, selflessness, and humility, to a status of lunacy but I am also unable to forget the blatent revelations of His own majesty that God has yielded unto me during my brief 19 year stint of life.
I pray that the blood of my friends (I consider literally anyone I know a friend in this regard) will not stain my hands now or ever.
I won't garner all of the peace, certainty, inexplicable guidance, and unabashed purpose that overflows in my life to myself.
Wisdom calls out in the streets, how much longer will you choose to evade it, and for how much longer will you choose to nurture new reasonings in order to justify this type of evasion? It doesn't matter what you have done, Christ still wants you. What if the "leap of faith," the leap from living a life filled with aimlesness, and uncertainty, to a life of purpose, isn't actually that scary but is rather a simple surrender?
I make each of the previous contentions as a sinner and hypocrit in need of Christ's unfailing love and mercy just as much as the next.
Friday, July 3, 2009
July 4th, 2009
Greetings people, and happy 4th!
Just got done seeing public enemies, had to pay 9.50 to see it... Anyways it was a pretty good movie, I recommend it (not sure I recommend spending 9.50 to see it though).
Seeing as its July 4th I think I should adress some sort of "political" issue so I've chosen to ramble on about the legalization of marijuana this time around and also on whether or not it should even be considered moral.
***Disclaimer*** Lest I further myself as a hyprocrite... I confess to smoking marijuana as recent as July 2008 (about one year ago), and yes I did it more than once, and yes...... I was way baked.
Moreover!
All to often potheads attempt to use Genesis 1:29 to justify their habit.
Gen 1:29 - And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Other versions end with the phrase, "and they (the plants of the earth) shall be used for food." Perhpas the potheads were to stoned at the time to have read the entire verse, which indicates that the plants should be used for food.... not for smoking. I suppose it would be hard to argue a "super-stoner" who contends that it is okay to eat marijuana because of what this verse says, but I myself have a hard time taking that contention seriously.
If weed smokers really wanted to justify their habit they would attempt to utilize the following verse - Psalms 104:14 "He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man." Perhaps because the typical pot smoker is too lazy to truly locate this verse (haha get it), so they settle for the one in Genesis... located in the very front of the Bible.
I just thought I'd get that spiel over with as it is something that I consider to be rather heinous. I will begin by sharing what I believe to be the "devils advocate" stance against what is probably the typical Christian viewpoint. Not only does the Bible not say anything specifically that prohibits the use of marijuana but studies indicate that if marijuana were in fact legal, different crime and violence rates and/or statistics would drop drastically. Why would this not be a good thing by Biblical standards; afterall the Bible does condemn violence and crime. If marijuana were made legal it might even boost the economy a bit due to the fact that it would then become a taxable entity. According to more studies Marijuana is even less menacing than alcohol, and by a long shot. As far as whether or not marijuana is moral, we shouldn't forget that there exists an entire Christian "denomination" based around getting high, the rastafarian "sect." The rastafarians believe that marijuana is the herb described in the book of Revelation as a plant that will bring peace unto the nations. Marijuana is also used as a "supplement" before and during Bible studies, and times of worship within Rastafarian customs.
Now for my own thoughts on the whether or not marijuana should be considered moral and whether or not it should be legalized.
While marijuana may be less harmful than alcohol, and while it may in fact "prevent" other crimes from happening, smoking, or even possessing substantial quantities of marijuana is a crime within itself. Scripture is crystal clear in regards to keeping the law. Scripture indicates that it is a must to keep the laws of your government so long as it does not directly contradict scripture. One must also ask themselves if they can truly glorify God while smoking marijuana. Although scripture does not directly condemn "getting high" it does condemn drunkeness, which can easily be compared to getting high. But just because scripture condemns something that is similar to being high, does not make it wrong in itself. Being high is wrong (in my opinion) because you become less of who God created you to be, and more of spiritless victim to autopilot, in the same way one would become if they were drunk. Don't soil your britches just yet potheads, I am not contending that smoking marijuana is wrong all together. God did create marijuana afterall, and it is a plant that grows out of the ground for goodness sakes (what could be more natural). I would contend that if marijuana were legal, that it would not be a sin for someone (including Christians) to smoke marijuana so long as they did not actually get high, just as it would be perfectly permissable for a Christian to enjoy small amounts of alcohol without getting drunk.
Should marijuana be legal? Yes, marijuana should be legalalized! Especially while alcohol is legal. Not only is it possible for somehow to "miraculously avoid killing, eating,raping, and pillaging babies while they're either slightly buzzed or extremely baked on marijuana" but is extremely likely that when someone gets buzzed or high they will mind their own frickin business.
Let us review my thoughts on mary jane.
-Ultimately smoking weed in and of itself would not be sin if it were legal, while getting high of marijuana would.
-Ultimately it is sin to smoke marijuana because it is illegal and scripture instructs us to confrom to the laws of our government.
-Marijuana should be legalized because a government has no right to tell a man or a woman what they can and cannot inhale into their lungs.
Finally my ramblings in regards to marijuana are done and I will leave you with a short description of what my next blog will entail and a song that I've recently been hooked on.
Next time I'm going to have my go on the issue of abortion (gasp). Lastly, be sure to check out a song called "All it takes for your dreams to come true" by A Skylit Drive.
Thanks a ton for reading! Feel free to go through the not so tedious process of registering with this website in order to respond to my post!
Just got done seeing public enemies, had to pay 9.50 to see it... Anyways it was a pretty good movie, I recommend it (not sure I recommend spending 9.50 to see it though).
Seeing as its July 4th I think I should adress some sort of "political" issue so I've chosen to ramble on about the legalization of marijuana this time around and also on whether or not it should even be considered moral.
***Disclaimer*** Lest I further myself as a hyprocrite... I confess to smoking marijuana as recent as July 2008 (about one year ago), and yes I did it more than once, and yes...... I was way baked.
Moreover!
All to often potheads attempt to use Genesis 1:29 to justify their habit.
Gen 1:29 - And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Other versions end with the phrase, "and they (the plants of the earth) shall be used for food." Perhpas the potheads were to stoned at the time to have read the entire verse, which indicates that the plants should be used for food.... not for smoking. I suppose it would be hard to argue a "super-stoner" who contends that it is okay to eat marijuana because of what this verse says, but I myself have a hard time taking that contention seriously.
If weed smokers really wanted to justify their habit they would attempt to utilize the following verse - Psalms 104:14 "He causeth the grass to grow for the cattle, and herb for the service of man." Perhaps because the typical pot smoker is too lazy to truly locate this verse (haha get it), so they settle for the one in Genesis... located in the very front of the Bible.
I just thought I'd get that spiel over with as it is something that I consider to be rather heinous. I will begin by sharing what I believe to be the "devils advocate" stance against what is probably the typical Christian viewpoint. Not only does the Bible not say anything specifically that prohibits the use of marijuana but studies indicate that if marijuana were in fact legal, different crime and violence rates and/or statistics would drop drastically. Why would this not be a good thing by Biblical standards; afterall the Bible does condemn violence and crime. If marijuana were made legal it might even boost the economy a bit due to the fact that it would then become a taxable entity. According to more studies Marijuana is even less menacing than alcohol, and by a long shot. As far as whether or not marijuana is moral, we shouldn't forget that there exists an entire Christian "denomination" based around getting high, the rastafarian "sect." The rastafarians believe that marijuana is the herb described in the book of Revelation as a plant that will bring peace unto the nations. Marijuana is also used as a "supplement" before and during Bible studies, and times of worship within Rastafarian customs.
Now for my own thoughts on the whether or not marijuana should be considered moral and whether or not it should be legalized.
While marijuana may be less harmful than alcohol, and while it may in fact "prevent" other crimes from happening, smoking, or even possessing substantial quantities of marijuana is a crime within itself. Scripture is crystal clear in regards to keeping the law. Scripture indicates that it is a must to keep the laws of your government so long as it does not directly contradict scripture. One must also ask themselves if they can truly glorify God while smoking marijuana. Although scripture does not directly condemn "getting high" it does condemn drunkeness, which can easily be compared to getting high. But just because scripture condemns something that is similar to being high, does not make it wrong in itself. Being high is wrong (in my opinion) because you become less of who God created you to be, and more of spiritless victim to autopilot, in the same way one would become if they were drunk. Don't soil your britches just yet potheads, I am not contending that smoking marijuana is wrong all together. God did create marijuana afterall, and it is a plant that grows out of the ground for goodness sakes (what could be more natural). I would contend that if marijuana were legal, that it would not be a sin for someone (including Christians) to smoke marijuana so long as they did not actually get high, just as it would be perfectly permissable for a Christian to enjoy small amounts of alcohol without getting drunk.
Should marijuana be legal? Yes, marijuana should be legalalized! Especially while alcohol is legal. Not only is it possible for somehow to "miraculously avoid killing, eating,raping, and pillaging babies while they're either slightly buzzed or extremely baked on marijuana" but is extremely likely that when someone gets buzzed or high they will mind their own frickin business.
Let us review my thoughts on mary jane.
-Ultimately smoking weed in and of itself would not be sin if it were legal, while getting high of marijuana would.
-Ultimately it is sin to smoke marijuana because it is illegal and scripture instructs us to confrom to the laws of our government.
-Marijuana should be legalized because a government has no right to tell a man or a woman what they can and cannot inhale into their lungs.
Finally my ramblings in regards to marijuana are done and I will leave you with a short description of what my next blog will entail and a song that I've recently been hooked on.
Next time I'm going to have my go on the issue of abortion (gasp). Lastly, be sure to check out a song called "All it takes for your dreams to come true" by A Skylit Drive.
Thanks a ton for reading! Feel free to go through the not so tedious process of registering with this website in order to respond to my post!
Friday, June 26, 2009
That's what he said...
So...
I'm going to be home alone for the next 3 weeks (as of today).
Possibly my favorite band (hit the lights) just came out with a new ep (extended play) and it sounds absolutely incredible. You need to check out songs such as "Coast to Coast," and "Pulse," they're way awesome.
Another one of my favorite bands (all time low) is releasing their new cd July 7th, and I am more excited than I was during the slo motion Megan Fox scene during the second transformers flick...
P.S. If you are a girl that is reading this, do not insinuate the whoreishness of Megan Fox just because she is a very pretty girl who just so happens to be pretty enought to have her own slo motion segment in a bigtime blockbuster movie. God made you the way you are, and the fact that thousands upon thousands of young men across the country behaved and will behave chauvinisticly when Megan Fox is displayed in a rather superficial manner up on the big screen does not change the fact God made you the way you are and simply wants you to take care of yourself and be happy with the fact that you don't look like everyone else. Wow, I didn't realize that spiel would be as long as it was... anyways... new all time low album... I am thoroughly excited for it.
I should be adopting this kitten I've been rambling about this weekend hopefully... which will likely exhaust my already miniscule aptitudes for responsibility seeing as my parents will be away and I will have to look after the kitten all by my lonesome.
Now for the slightly more weighty segment of this blog entry...
I know I've already made reference to the new transformers flick (which I highly reccomend), but a film that I found to be much more moving, and just as enjoyable, was a picture known only as "The Soloist." "The Soloist," (supposedly based on a true story) is a tale about a journalist, plagued by writers block, who meets a sensational violinist/cellist (cellist being a term used to describe one who excels at playing the cello) who is antogonized by a combination far worse than mere writers block. Jamie Fox plays a poverty stricken, schizophrenic who wanders the streets of Los Angeles playing his violin that furnishes only two strings. The struggling journalist and the perfectly content spirit of a thoroughly tortured soul, meet by chance near a statue just outside of the L.A. Times headquarters where adventure and inspiration ensue. Needless to say I not only recommend this movie but I insist that you see it!
Finally, I just wanted to mention, in case anyone out there wants to interact with my entries, that it takes little time to setup an acount with google.com. Once you have an account you can create your own blog, or perhaps just comment on mine. I suppose that is all for today... toodles!
I'm going to be home alone for the next 3 weeks (as of today).
Possibly my favorite band (hit the lights) just came out with a new ep (extended play) and it sounds absolutely incredible. You need to check out songs such as "Coast to Coast," and "Pulse," they're way awesome.
Another one of my favorite bands (all time low) is releasing their new cd July 7th, and I am more excited than I was during the slo motion Megan Fox scene during the second transformers flick...
P.S. If you are a girl that is reading this, do not insinuate the whoreishness of Megan Fox just because she is a very pretty girl who just so happens to be pretty enought to have her own slo motion segment in a bigtime blockbuster movie. God made you the way you are, and the fact that thousands upon thousands of young men across the country behaved and will behave chauvinisticly when Megan Fox is displayed in a rather superficial manner up on the big screen does not change the fact God made you the way you are and simply wants you to take care of yourself and be happy with the fact that you don't look like everyone else. Wow, I didn't realize that spiel would be as long as it was... anyways... new all time low album... I am thoroughly excited for it.
I should be adopting this kitten I've been rambling about this weekend hopefully... which will likely exhaust my already miniscule aptitudes for responsibility seeing as my parents will be away and I will have to look after the kitten all by my lonesome.
Now for the slightly more weighty segment of this blog entry...
I know I've already made reference to the new transformers flick (which I highly reccomend), but a film that I found to be much more moving, and just as enjoyable, was a picture known only as "The Soloist." "The Soloist," (supposedly based on a true story) is a tale about a journalist, plagued by writers block, who meets a sensational violinist/cellist (cellist being a term used to describe one who excels at playing the cello) who is antogonized by a combination far worse than mere writers block. Jamie Fox plays a poverty stricken, schizophrenic who wanders the streets of Los Angeles playing his violin that furnishes only two strings. The struggling journalist and the perfectly content spirit of a thoroughly tortured soul, meet by chance near a statue just outside of the L.A. Times headquarters where adventure and inspiration ensue. Needless to say I not only recommend this movie but I insist that you see it!
Finally, I just wanted to mention, in case anyone out there wants to interact with my entries, that it takes little time to setup an acount with google.com. Once you have an account you can create your own blog, or perhaps just comment on mine. I suppose that is all for today... toodles!
Monday, June 22, 2009
June 22nd
Kitty update! Wow that sounded extroardinarily gay, which is interesting because I'm going to state my own thoughts regarding "gay Christians" in this post.
I went over to pick up the kitten that I described in the first post to no avail. The current owner wants to hold on to it for about another week, which is understandable (is understandable a word?!) because it is not even 3 weeks old and it is quite important that it be with its siblings for a short while after birth. Can't wait though!!
So here goes as to my theories on the "certain damnation of gays!!!!" Only kidding obviously...
First let it be known that I am a Christian and I believe that scripture is innerrant, thus I deem it necessary to include Romans chapter 1 into these shananigans.
18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
21For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
24Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
28Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. 29They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
After honing my own exegesis of previous passage, I would contend that homosexuals (WHO DO NOT MERELY STRUGGLE WITH HOMOSEXUALITY, BUT RATHER MAINTAIN A HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE IN A SCRUPULOUS AND COMFORTABLE MANNER), in all likelyhood, do go to hell. WAIT! LET ME EXPLAIN! I do not say this because their sin is unforgiveable! I say this mainly because the previous passage seems to identify homosexuals with those described in verse 31; verse 31 providing the description of FAITHLESS. Now, I am hoping for feedback on this post, so please, tell me how one can be faithless, as described by scripture,(perhaps faithless that God can help them overcome their lusts) and receive salvation at the same time.
Sometimes, when one attempts to combine to passages, or verses of scripture the result is a pound of completely arbitrary and relative conceptions. A good illustration of this is the age old atheistic argument "God cannot be love, and a jealous God at the same time." Scripture says that 1. God is love, 2. God is a jealous God, and 3. Love is not jealous. To the untrained eye, the hypothesis that contends that the combination of these 3 verses disproves God (or at least the Christian God) seems logical, but when the exact contexts of points 2, and 3 are more closely examined one can note that the exact meanings of the word jealous in either passage are quite different. God is jealous of our attention, faith, and comradarie, to say that God is jealous of our traits, or possesions, or abilities, (which is what would be implied if the most common connotation of the word "jealous" was used) is utterly irrational, and actually quite laughable. This said, scripture (Phillipians) indicates that true Christians are in a constant state of perfection, and conformity to Christ. Not only this, but scripture also says that God refuses to furnish any temptation unto man that he is not capable of overcoming.
All this said, I believe that a homosexual can indeed be a Christian, if and only if he or she has affirmed his or her desires as sin, and is seeking Christs help to change.
If you disagree, please say so!
I went over to pick up the kitten that I described in the first post to no avail. The current owner wants to hold on to it for about another week, which is understandable (is understandable a word?!) because it is not even 3 weeks old and it is quite important that it be with its siblings for a short while after birth. Can't wait though!!
So here goes as to my theories on the "certain damnation of gays!!!!" Only kidding obviously...
First let it be known that I am a Christian and I believe that scripture is innerrant, thus I deem it necessary to include Romans chapter 1 into these shananigans.
18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
21For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
24Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
28Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done. 29They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
After honing my own exegesis of previous passage, I would contend that homosexuals (WHO DO NOT MERELY STRUGGLE WITH HOMOSEXUALITY, BUT RATHER MAINTAIN A HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE IN A SCRUPULOUS AND COMFORTABLE MANNER), in all likelyhood, do go to hell. WAIT! LET ME EXPLAIN! I do not say this because their sin is unforgiveable! I say this mainly because the previous passage seems to identify homosexuals with those described in verse 31; verse 31 providing the description of FAITHLESS. Now, I am hoping for feedback on this post, so please, tell me how one can be faithless, as described by scripture,(perhaps faithless that God can help them overcome their lusts) and receive salvation at the same time.
Sometimes, when one attempts to combine to passages, or verses of scripture the result is a pound of completely arbitrary and relative conceptions. A good illustration of this is the age old atheistic argument "God cannot be love, and a jealous God at the same time." Scripture says that 1. God is love, 2. God is a jealous God, and 3. Love is not jealous. To the untrained eye, the hypothesis that contends that the combination of these 3 verses disproves God (or at least the Christian God) seems logical, but when the exact contexts of points 2, and 3 are more closely examined one can note that the exact meanings of the word jealous in either passage are quite different. God is jealous of our attention, faith, and comradarie, to say that God is jealous of our traits, or possesions, or abilities, (which is what would be implied if the most common connotation of the word "jealous" was used) is utterly irrational, and actually quite laughable. This said, scripture (Phillipians) indicates that true Christians are in a constant state of perfection, and conformity to Christ. Not only this, but scripture also says that God refuses to furnish any temptation unto man that he is not capable of overcoming.
All this said, I believe that a homosexual can indeed be a Christian, if and only if he or she has affirmed his or her desires as sin, and is seeking Christs help to change.
If you disagree, please say so!
Saturday, June 20, 2009
June 21st
Took long enough... I signed up on-line to begin this blog months ago... well... at least one month ago. Anyways, because this is my first blog post it's just going to be an accumulation of my exceedingly humorous ramblings, nothing to serious. Chances are, this blog will turn out to be a place where I can spew out my own deceits regarding political and religous issues in order to further the decay of our country and the world wide web... ....... joking... but fo' real yo', this blog will serve as a place where I will come to express my thoughts on different politcal and moral issues (you gotta get them out somehow) and also as a place where I can simply share and receive wisdom on matters of less importance as well. So now that I got that crap out of the way, please, enjoy a nice lifeless stupor as you are exceedingly bewildered by my very own"Special Fathers' day/ opening blog thing."
So for fathers' day I got my father a book he really wanted entitled "The Patriots' Bible." It is essentially a study Bible that probably has a bunch of "Olde Time" political jargon regarding how America is a Christian nation, yadi yada. Moreover, the book for overly right wing, somewhat grumpy old guys that I bought my father is of much less importance than another affair at hand in my graceful epoch. I am getting a kitten!! Fo fwee cracka!! HAHAHA! No but seriously... whilst I delivered pizzas tonight I made a delivery to this cat (much pun intended) that had recently discovered a band of baby tigers... okay so they were just kittens... Before I left, a young lady sitting next to the kittens asked if I wanted one... I replied "uhhh... does a bear poop in the woods?!!? OF COURSE I WANT A CUTE AND CUDDLY KITTEN!!" No, but fo realz I was all like... well yea that'd be cool but my mom probably wouldn't go for it... you know... I kind of just said that to get out of there (seeing as I was still working and all). But then I realized when I got to my car that my dad is too preoccupied with writing his book and with the Chicago Cubs unlikely successes (unlikely because they suck butt for the last one hundred years... literally... no not literally about the sucking butt part... ewww... literally about the one hundred years part) and that my mom would probably be okay with one of the kittens due to their exceedingly high quantities of cuteness that I could probably get away with bringing one home.
So, in an attempt to finish this blog up quickly, I'm going to go out and purchase all the things that a kitten would need (you know, litter box, cat food, razor sharp fang implants... what?) and present it gracefully to my mother. That's that.
Methinks my next blog will entail the whole "do gay people go to hell" debate. It's something that is being discussed an awful lot as of late, and I'd love to see what others think of my own synopsis on the issue.
Conforming only to Christ,
Daniel Deckard.
So for fathers' day I got my father a book he really wanted entitled "The Patriots' Bible." It is essentially a study Bible that probably has a bunch of "Olde Time" political jargon regarding how America is a Christian nation, yadi yada. Moreover, the book for overly right wing, somewhat grumpy old guys that I bought my father is of much less importance than another affair at hand in my graceful epoch. I am getting a kitten!! Fo fwee cracka!! HAHAHA! No but seriously... whilst I delivered pizzas tonight I made a delivery to this cat (much pun intended) that had recently discovered a band of baby tigers... okay so they were just kittens... Before I left, a young lady sitting next to the kittens asked if I wanted one... I replied "uhhh... does a bear poop in the woods?!!? OF COURSE I WANT A CUTE AND CUDDLY KITTEN!!" No, but fo realz I was all like... well yea that'd be cool but my mom probably wouldn't go for it... you know... I kind of just said that to get out of there (seeing as I was still working and all). But then I realized when I got to my car that my dad is too preoccupied with writing his book and with the Chicago Cubs unlikely successes (unlikely because they suck butt for the last one hundred years... literally... no not literally about the sucking butt part... ewww... literally about the one hundred years part) and that my mom would probably be okay with one of the kittens due to their exceedingly high quantities of cuteness that I could probably get away with bringing one home.
So, in an attempt to finish this blog up quickly, I'm going to go out and purchase all the things that a kitten would need (you know, litter box, cat food, razor sharp fang implants... what?) and present it gracefully to my mother. That's that.
Methinks my next blog will entail the whole "do gay people go to hell" debate. It's something that is being discussed an awful lot as of late, and I'd love to see what others think of my own synopsis on the issue.
Conforming only to Christ,
Daniel Deckard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
